ESET Cyber Security works with macOS versions back to 10.12 (Sierra), the same as Clario, Webroot, and others. Mac users typically stay up to date, but if you’re stuck with an antique macOS version, perhaps due to old hardware, you might consider ProtectWorks or ClamXAV (for Mac), both of which extend support all the way back to 10.6 (Snow Leopard).ESET Endpoint Security - EES for Windows and EESX for Mac - Renewal - 500 - 999 Users, 1 Year. Quantity must be 500 or greater.
![]() Eset Antivirus Review Free Antivirus AndAvast Free Antivirus and Bitdefender took Advanced+ in all four tests.I also follow reports from AV-Test Institute, but ESET hasn't appeared in this lab's reports since about a year ago. Of the four tests from this lab that I follow, NOD32 received three Advanced+ certifications and one Advanced. A product that passes any test receives Standard certification, while those that go beyond the minimum passing score can take Advanced or Advanced+ certification. Like about half of the products appearing in the latest test report, NOD32 achieved AAA certification.At AV-Comparatives, testers don't assign numeric scores. Turbotax deluxe for macScan ChoicesI timed a full scan of my standard clean test system and found that NOD32 finished in 66 minutes. Tested by all four labs, Avira scored 9.9 points and Kaspersky 9.7. ESET's 9.7 is quite good, though Bitdefender, also tested by three labs, managed a perfect 10. You can drop suspect files or folders on the scan page for a quick checkup. A second scan finished in just seven minutes.NOD32 doesn't offer the quick scan option found in many antivirus products, but it gives you several custom scanning choices. Also, during that initial scan, NOD32 optimizes for subsequent scanning, marking known good programs that don't require another look. I assume it works I have no way to trigger its protection for testing purposes. The UEFI scanner also runs in the background, making sure no malware has subverted your firmware. UEFI (which stands for Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) is what modern computers use instead of the antique BIOS. And from the custom scan menu you can scan memory, boot sectors, or any local or network drive.The boot sector scan I mentioned also actively triggers NOD32's UEFI scanner. However, it only eliminated 31 percent of them at this point. Even when results are available, I still run my hands-on malware protection testing, so I can see the product's defenses in action.When I opened the folder containing my current collection of malware samples, NOD32's real-time protection gave them the once-over. Very Good Malware ProtectionI'm always happy to have results reported by the independent labs, but not every product makes it into those reports. In other cases, it caught a malware component during the installation process.Like Norton, Bitdefender, and several others, ESET detected 93 percent of the samples one way or another. It did flag some as potentially unwanted applications (PUAs) I chose to delete all of those. Clearly the antivirus applies a tougher standard to programs that are about to launch it prevented quite a few samples from launching at all. To check a product's protection against current in-the-wild threats, I start with a feed of malware-hosting URLs detected in the last few days by researchers at MRG-Effitas. G Data came close, with 97 percent detection and 9.5 points.It takes me quite a while to collect and analyze a new set of malware samples, so those necessarily stay the same for months. Tested with this same sample set, Webroot SecureAnywhere AntiVirus managed 100 percent detection and a perfect 10 points. However, others have done even better. That's an impressive showing. I counted these as successful detections.NOD32 protected against 95 percent of the malware downloads, leaning heavily toward blocking at the URL level. If a non-browser program attempted to access such a site, you'd just see that popup, and indeed, I ran into that situation in testing.In some cases, NOD32 described a site as potentially unwanted, using a yellow banner rather than red, much as it distinguishes potentially unwanted applications from undeniable malware. Phishing websites imitate secure sites of all kinds, from online banking systems to dating sites. Fooling people into just giving you those passwords can be much easier. So-So Phishing ProtectionWriting code to evade antivirus tools and steal people's passwords is tough. In their latest tests, Kaspersky and McAfee AntiVirus Plus flagged 100 percent of the phishing URLs, and another half-dozen managed 97 percent or better. Analyzing those that remain gives me a window into the product's phishing protection skills.NOD32 detected 85 percent of the verified frauds, which isn't great. If it doesn't fit the profile for a phishing site, meaning it's trying to steal login credentials, I discard it. I launch each suspected URL in a browser protected by the product under test and simultaneously in instances of Chrome, Firefox, and Internet Explorer protected only by the browser's built-in phishing detection.If a URL doesn't load properly in any of the four test systems, I discard it. Phishing sites are ephemeral, and the very newest ones are typically the most effective. It's possible to spot phishing scams if you're alert, but having help from your antivirus means you're protected even before you've had your coffee.To start my phishing test, I scrape reported frauds from websites that track such things, making sure to include ones that are so new they haven't yet been analyzed and blacklisted. To test the mettle of this component, I hit the test system with 30 exploits generated by the CORE Impact penetration tool. That's not uncommon, but in recent tests McAfee and Webroot performed precisely the same on the two platforms.See How We Test Security Software HIPS to Block ExploitsESET's suite products add firewall and network protection, but, as with Norton, even the standalone antivirus offers a Host Intrusion Prevention System (HIPS). It earned a lower score overall. That's a better score than many, though not at the top. NOD32 detected 55 percent of the attacks, identifying about half of those by the official exploit number.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorDenise ArchivesCategories |